Seeing the whole system
Holding projects, teams, finances and the client together, and seeing how they influence each other, rather than dealing with them one after the other.
SME owner, company head or member of an executive committee: a gifted business leader (HPI in French) sees fast, wide and far. They rarely lack ideas. What they most often lack is someone who keeps up at the same speed, and an organization that turns their intuitions into decisions that hold. This page is about that, and only that: organization, not psychology.
Being gifted refers, by convention, to an intelligence quotient of at least 130. The scale is built to follow a normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15: 130 is two standard deviations, and the share of the population above it is a property of the distribution, 2.3%, or one person in forty-four. The detail is on our page how many people are gifted.
We do not make a diagnosis: only an assessment carried out by a psychologist establishes a quotient. We do not carry them out, and we ask no one for theirs. For the day-to-day signs, on the colleague side, read our article how to identify a gifted colleague at work.
Tendencies, not certainties: every person is different. But these strengths come up again and again, and they are valuable at the head of an organization.
Holding projects, teams, finances and the client together, and seeing how they influence each other, rather than dealing with them one after the other.
Sensing that a project is going badly before the figures say so, and that a client has doubts before they write it down.
Exploring several paths at once, and finding a solution where others see a dead end. Complexity stimulates instead of wearing down.
An independence of mind that resists conformism and decisions made out of habit.
New ideas, unexpected connections, a strategy that does not merely extend what already exists.
A need to understand why things are done, which pushes the organization to clarify its priorities.
A study published in 2017 in the Journal of Applied Psychology (John Antonakis, Robert House and Dean Keith Simonton) measured the intelligence of leaders and how their staff perceived their leadership. Perceived effectiveness rises with the leader's intelligence, then levels off and declines beyond about 1.2 standard deviations above the mean of their group.
So intelligence is not the problem: the distance from those who must follow is. More complex solutions, shortcuts the team cannot see, a speed that nobody can sustain.
The answer is not to think less fast. It is to organize the translation.
Routines that turn an intuition into a written, shared and followed decision; managers who relay; and someone who keeps up at the same speed, to test ideas before they spread through the organization.
These are not flaws in the leader: they are differences in pace, which are settled through organization.
The leader is already three moves ahead, while the team is still carrying out the first. Without a record of decisions or follow-up, priorities change before they have been delivered.
An idea thrown out in a meeting becomes a different version for each person. What is not written down and assigned is not decided.
In the short term, yes. In the medium term, every decision goes up to the top, and the leader's calendar becomes the company's bottleneck.
Around the table, few people can contradict without risk, and fewer still at the same speed. Blind spots stay blind.
The shadow board: an outside view that keeps up at the same speed, stress-tests ideas and says what nobody dares to say. Our experts share this way of thinking, and have held executive positions.
Operational mentoring for managers: the people who translate strategy into the week's work, and keep the team engaged.
A committee that decides, a record of decisions and actions, commitments that are followed. These routines can live in pylotik, which keeps track of what was decided and by whom.
30 minutes to talk about your organization, with someone who has led.
Free strategic interview